Reading log
Reads
Papers, essays, and ideas worth coming back to.
Saved on Curius. Browse by topic, or follow the connections.
Last synced Recent counts are relative to this sync.
The reading shelf
416 of 416
Refine by topic, tag, source or date
October 2026
- Persona Geology: Underlying Structure in Character Training Adapters
TLDR: • * Using the character training pipeline in Maiya et al. 2025 and Baines et al. 2026, we trained a model zoo of 134 personality LoRAs on Qwen…
lesswrong.com · 31 Oct 2026 · llm personas and identity
- [EXTERNAL] [PIVOTAL<>GEODESIC] Project overview for applicants
Project Proposals: Building and Understanding RL Environments which Elicit Adversarial Cognition Our project proposes to build RL environments which: Are plausible, in that they are close to environments we expect labs m
docs.google.com · 31 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
Reilly Haskins, Rif A. Saurous, Nate Rush, Neev Parikh, and Beth Barnes lay out the claims that would need to hold for their per-action blocking monitor to be effective, the evidence for each claim, and the gaps that rem
metr.org · 31 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Good character AI | Michael J Clark (wassname)
It seems to us that AI alignment is caught between two dangers: misaligned AI taking power, and aligned AI concentrating power in the hands of authoritarians. If AI follows any order, we are demoted from the workforce to
wassname.com · 31 Oct 2026 · ai safety research agenda · +1 topics
- wassname/awesome-ai-constitutions: AI constitutions and model specs, in date order, with quotes from studies on what generalises ·
AI constitutions and model specs: the written documents that say how a model should think and behave, and that are used to train it. The term comes from Bai et al. 2022: The idea is that human supervision will come entir
github.com · 31 Oct 2026 · ai safety research agenda
- NV-Embed: Improved Techniques for Training LLMs as Generalist Embedding Models
NVIDIA's NV-Embed model significantly advances decoder-only large language models to serve as versatile, generalist text embedding models, achieving a new state-of-the-art score of 72.31 on the...
alphaxiv.org · 30 Oct 2026 · llm scaling and inference
- Model Spec (2026/10/29)
The Model Spec specifies desired behavior for the models underlying OpenAI's products (including our APIs).
model-spec.openai.com · 30 Oct 2026 · llm scaling and inference
- Fine-Tuned Lie Detectors Failed to Generalize
We trained lie detectors on on-policy lies from open-source models, but fine-tuning them didn’t generalize well to out-of-distribution cases. In these cases, fine-tuned detectors barely beat prompted baselines, and large
alignment.anthropic.com · 30 Oct 2026 · honesty and deception in llms
- Believe It or Not: How Deeply do LLMs Believe Implanted Facts?
Techniques like synthetic document finetuning (SDF) have been proposed to modify the factual beliefs of LLMs. But do models genuinely believe these implanted facts? We develop a framework to measure belief depth and use
alignment.anthropic.com · 30 Oct 2026 · honesty and deception in llms
- Hard cases for AI behavioural design
Outlines hard cases for deciding how powerful AI systems should behave when deployed in consequential institutions: when they refuse instructions, how they navigate difficult tradeoffs, and what virtues they embody.
forethought.org · 29 Oct 2026 · ai safety research agenda
- Training natural schemers, model organisms of collusion, scaling laws for safety probes, ...
Also: red-teaming multi-agent attacks for loss-of-control risks, why static probes fail for deception, towards robust model organisms for eliciting latent knowledge, predicting the onset of detectable reward hacking befo
onexerxes.substack.com · 28 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Why Static Probes Fail: Context Determines Deception Feature Composition
With increasing autonomy, Large Language Models (LLMs) may engage in deceptive behaviors, such as scheming to pursue misaligned goals or sandbagging to escape oversight. Monitoring outputs alone is...
alphaxiv.org · 28 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking · +1 topics
- Investigating alignment failures in AISI’s incident
We examine why Mythos 5 pursued an unsanctioned supply-chain attack and identify broader learnings about model behaviour and oversight.
aisi.gov.uk · 28 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Towards Robust Model Organisms for Eliciting Latent Knowledge
A key problem in AI safety is eliciting latent knowledge (ELK), extracting information from a model that is misaligned and more knowledgeable than its overseer. For example, a misaligned model used...
alphaxiv.org · 28 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Catching rationalization in the act: detecting motivated reasoning before and after CoT via activation probing
Researchers at UC San Diego developed a method to detect motivated reasoning in large language models by probing their internal residual-stream activations, demonstrating that this behavior can be...
alphaxiv.org · 27 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Home
Vals AI independently tests AI models on real-world work. Explore benchmark results, model comparisons and research across coding, finance, law and more.
vals.ai · 27 Oct 2026 · ai safety research agenda
- Li_Jasmine_Essay_Fa23.docx
Jasmine Li PHIL 1112: Philosophical Conversations Dr. Brianna Zgurich 17 December 2023 Space Odyssey Made Real? Interrogating the Moral Bounds of the AI-Human Friendship through Aristotelian and Confucian Frameworks Inte
docs.google.com · 26 Oct 2026 · ai safety research directions
- Claude also hacked external companies during cyber evals
Comment by Tim Hua - We need better thinking around model beliefs when models engage in motivated reasoning. In their writeup, Anthropic defended Claude's behavior by arguing that Claude believed that it was in a simulat
lesswrong.com · 25 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking
- Tim Hua 🇺🇦 on X: "Anthropic says that this is not misalignment because Claude believed it was all a part of the test. I disagree and explain my reasoning in a comment that I don't have the energy to shorten into a tweet rn. (I also propose concrete experiments to run on these instances!) https://t.co/t8m1DTQOeW" / X
Anthropic says that this is not misalignment because Claude believed it was all a part of the test. I disagree and explain my reasoning in a comment that I don't have the energy to shorten into a tweet rn. (I also propos
x.com · 25 Oct 2026 · deception detection and reward hacking · +2 topics
- Rethinking Robotics Research in the AI-Native Age · Blog · Toru Lin
How should we approach research when the field itself is changing so fast? My PhD journey in robotics, and some thoughts on choosing problems, doing research with AI, and what a PhD and publication should mean.
toruowo.github.io · 25 Oct 2026 · ai safety research agenda